New study analyses StratCom in crisis - how East Asian countries responded to the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 crisis is an unprecedented event in almost every way, not least from a strategic communications perspective. Faced with uncertainty about the development of the virus and its impact on society, governments are under enormous pressure to communicate policy initiatives and advice to their publics under extraordinary circumstances.

While recognising that the crisis is still unfolding at a global level, this report explores how countries chose to act and communicate in relation to the outbreak of the virus during the initial period of the crisis. Although it is still far too early to evaluate the effectiveness of any approach, comparing and contrasting different courses of action at an early stage provides valuable insight into different crisis communication strategies when swift and unanticipated communications were required.

For this purpose, four countries in Asia were selected for study: Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Malaysia. East Asian countries were hit by the COVID-19 virus at an early stage of the pandemic and have been regarded as ‘first responders’ because they were relatively unconditioned by other countries’ responses to the crisis. To capture official responses during the initial period of the pandemic, we collected data on the policy actions and government communications enacted in each country throughout the period 2 January 2020 to 17 February 2020.

We collected data on the policy actions and government communications enacted in each country throughout the period 2 January 2020 to 17 February 2020 and used survey data from Black Box Research, a communications research company based in Singapore, to determine the level of anxiety amongst the local population of nine Asian countries over the period of 14–17 February

Our research indicates that strategic communications approaches, both traditional communications and policy responses, have an influential effect on behaviour and perceptions, even in the midst of a global crisis.

Our comparative analysis of the four case studies revealed less correlation between the number of confirmed infections and the behaviours and perceptions of affected populations than we had expected. In fact, we observed the opposite in Malaysia, where the population exhibited high levels of anxiety despite having the smallest share of COVID-19 cases among the countries studied.

Our study indicates that governments should implement a comprehensive communications strategy regarding standards of hygiene in tandem with an equally robust policy response in order to manage a health crisis effectively.

Click here to read the full report.